RE: draft-ietf-html-style-00.txt & class as a general selector

Chris Lilley wrote (in response to Scott E. Preece):
>So, in the interests of wrapping up - and knowing that you are unable to 
>attend WWW4, which is a pity as this issue will surely be discussed - 
>I would like to ask your opinion. If you could be there, and it came 
>to a vote, would you raise a blocking objection if the proposed STYLE 
>attribute was dropped, or constrained to point to a named style only?

I will be at WWW4, and I also object to removing the proposed STYLE 
attribute or constraining it to point to a named style only.