Re: css draft specification
Subject: Re: css draft specification
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Justin Greene)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:42:02 -0300
From email@example.com Mon Jul 10 14: 47:52 1995
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
X-Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org (Unverified)
Bert Bos wrote...
>If we allow absolute sizes like point, the author must be aware that
>the UA will only use these sizes as relative to a certain unit that
>depends on the occasion. If I project a page on a video wall, my
>software will interpret `point' to be about a centimeter, but when I
>print it on a 35mm slide, a `point' will be more like 0.01 mm.
>A unit like `pixels' that is neither relative nor absolute will be
>even more problematic, since no relation to any other size can be
>assumed. I guess the definition of `pixel' will be: in the case of an
>application that shows the document at about arm's length, a `pixel'
>is a unit of length between approximately 0.20 and 0.35 mm chosen by
>the application so that n pixels is visually different from (n+1)
>pixels, for n = 0, 1, 2,...N; other types of applications can extend
>this definition as appropriate.
My take on font size if I may, is that actual font size is not so important
(from a sytlesheet standpoint) but rather the relative sizes of the
different elements to a base size which I expect the user will be setting in
most cases. For example H6=base*110, H5=base*120...H1=base*160. After
configuring the default relationships, they could be overridden one by one
through the use of additional stylesheets by rededining the specific
instance of usage.
Justin Greene : email@example.com : http://www.greene.com
Greene COMMUNICATIONS Design, inc., Internet Development Group
216 West 18th St., Floor 12 : New York City : 10011 : 212-242-9308