- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:48:02 -0400
- To: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 2019-09-03 02:24, Fuqiao Xue a écrit : > Hi Gérard, > > Since the CR has been published, could you file it as a (or several) > GitHub issue(s), so that we can fix them before the next publication? > > Thanks, > > Fuqiao > >> On Sep 2, 2019, at 21:29, Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org> wrote: >> >>> The CSS Working Group would like to publish the CR of CSS Writing >>> Modes 3. >>> The document is available as: >> >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20190903/ >> >> 3 tiny issues. >> >> 1- >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20190903/images/orthogonal.svg >> used in Example 11 of section 7.3 Orthogonal Flows >> >> "extent" and "measure" are not defined anywhere; these are remainings >> of older versions. >> "measure" should be replaced by "inline size". >> "extent" should be replaced by "block size". Done: Issue 4272: [css-writing-modes-3] "extent" and "measure" are not defined in SVG image https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4272 >> >> 2- >> In an ideal version of the spec, colors of arrows would be consistent >> across sections and reused in all examples. >> So, blue would be for glyph orientation (pointing toward ascender side >> or "top" side of a line box), >> orange for inline flow and green for block flow. This one would involve considerable time, efforts to tweak 5 or 6 images. Ideally, colors of arrows would be consistently reused. The spec as edited is already excellent. >> 3- >> In >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20190903/#fig-text-orientation >> in section 5.1 after definition of sideways: >> the images are horizontally offset a bit from their terms. If I toggle >> off >> .figure img {display: block;} >> then the images are correctly aligned with their terms. Done. Issue 4273: [css-writing-modes-3] images of text-orientation values slightly offset from terms https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4273 Gérard
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2019 19:48:40 UTC