W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [css-sizing] Behavior with resolving a max-width: 100% against min-content

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:52:49 -0700
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57f3a18e-ccfb-2501-862e-9987e6ad95f2@inkedblade.net>
On 11/18/2015 09:35 AM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Hi there!
> Have a question prompted by http://crbug.com/294195
> Basically, we have a parent with "width: min-content;" and a child
> with "max-width: 100%;".
> Now, normally an intrinsic width like that would be considered
> indefinite, and therefore the max-width should also be indefinite. But
> in this case, we're talking about widths, which are normally definite.
> So... should this be treated as max-width: fill-available or as
> max-width: none? And what should fill-available be in this
> circumstance?

Note: This issue is now tracked at

We think this is now specified correctly in
See also testcase at

Please let us know if this seems correct or if further investigation/spec work is necessary!

~fantasai and TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 18:53:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 13 June 2018 18:53:18 UTC