- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:26:38 -0500
- To: OwN-3m-All <own3mall@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 2018-02-21 13:15, OwN-3m-All a écrit : >> It *is* progress. > > In your opinion. I don't agree. > >> Apple totally did it right; it’s the others who have been doing it >> wrong. > > Again, opinion. It's not a matter of fact. The underline change is > opinion based. > > The new way is inconsistent and looks bad to my eyes. > > You really prefer the way Chrome renders this text as oppose to > Firefox? > > https://s17.postimg.org/qqhjdkyfx/chrome_underline_ugly.jpg > > I don't. As far as I can see in your screenshot and after closer examination with regards to 'text-decoration-skip-ink: auto', the property text-decoration-skip-ink does not apply to normal blank white space (U+0020). That is important to state in this discussion. I initially (and incorrectly) thought that property text-decoration-skip-ink had a rendering effect on normal blank white space (U+0020). Finally, note that accessibility advocacy groups and experts formally discourage using underlining of non-clickable text and items. You want to reduce confusion, guesswork, hesitation of users. Gérard
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2018 22:27:08 UTC