- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:09:47 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On 11/18/2015 12:46 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/18/15 10:44 AM, fantasai wrote: >> On 11/17/2015 09:56 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>> The spec at https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds/#the-border-style >>> says: >>> >>> These properties set the style of the border, unless there is a >>> border image >>> >>> This is apparently confusing the WebKit and Blink developers (the >>> former sufficiently that they marked "invalid" a bug about >>> maybe actually following the border-image spec). >>> >>> I suggest simply removing this sentence, especially since it's >>> non-normative but being treated as normative by some implementors. >> >> Um. The fact that these properties set the style of the border is >> normative. What's the confusion over, specifically? > > The "unless there is a border image" part. Which people are using to justify not updating WebKit to the spec change from a > while back to have border-style:none mean border-image-width defaults to 0, as far as I can tell. See > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99922 Updated the spec to say # These properties set the style in which a box’s borders are drawn # (unless there is a <a href="#border-images">border image</a> drawn in their place). Let me know if this seems acceptable. In any case it looks like Webkit and Blink have accepted to fix their bugs. :) Although WebKit's patch seems to have stalled last November... ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2017 04:10:21 UTC