- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:04:56 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 28/11/2017 à 00:01, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > Really tho, I'm just confused by the behavior Daniel discovered. I'd > need to dig - is that actually required behavior? It seems weird to > tear apart the shorthand declaration just because you added a longhand > - that could just as easily have just been "border: thin solid red; > border-top-color: blue;". That would probably help but where do you stop? I mean when do you stop overriding 'border' through longhands instead of using longhands only? When more than half of longhands are overriden? From an implementation's point of view, that's going to be painful. People really expect border-color: red; border-width: thin; border-style: solid; and border: red thin solid; to be the same thing. Furthermore, there's a question of stylesheet readability and maintainability. We've changed a twenty years old behaviour that impacts the way people author borders. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 06:05:22 UTC