Re: [csswg] Agenda conf call 12-Oct-2016

Regrets, since I have a meeting from morning in Japan.

Regarding Tokyo F2F meeting, I'll read minutes and will reply if
needed.

Thanks

- Hiroshi

On 2016/10/12 9:34, Alan Stearns wrote:
> Time/Phone/WebEx details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg.
> See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2015AprJun/0206.html
>
> US Toll Number: +1-617-324-0000
>
> For local times, see:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20161012T16
>
> 0. Extra agenda items and other digressions
>
>
>
>
> 1. Upcoming 2017 meetings
>
> 2. Merge csswg-test into web-platform-tests
>    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0088.html
>
> 3. [css-syntax] [css21] url parsing contradiction between 2.1 and Syntax
>    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/412
>
> 4. [css2][css-inline] Definition of line-height calculations contradicts itself
>    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/391
>
> 5. [css-multicol] the minimum and preferred width of a multicol is not defined anywhere
>    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/420
>
> 6. [css-box-3][css-21] Positioning boxes with { float:left; width:0px; }
>    https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/576
>
> Then TPAC agenda overflow items, as time allows:
>
>
> CSS Pseudo Elements
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Acss-pseudo-4
>
> CSS Containment Terminology question
>
> @apply: Thinking we should put on back burner, as variables + ::part seems like sufficient feature set for v1 of custom elements. Agree?
>
> Baseline alignment issues
>     first/last syntax
>
> Hoisting things to table wrappers
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/324#issuecomment-235652352
>
> clip-path excluding fixed-position descendants
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 12:54:52 UTC