- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 00:20:41 +0200
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/01/2016 10:40 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > >> On Apr 30, 2016, at 11:25 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >> There's an issue marked in the spec for a better name for this >> concept: >> >> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-snappoints/#definitions >> # snap alignment container >> # A scroll container¡¯s snap alignment container is the >> # rectangle obtained by reducing its visual viewport >> # by its scroll-snap-padding. >> # >> # ISSUE: Better name for this concept? >> >> I propose ¡°scroll snap window¡±, ¡°snap window¡° for short! >> (I.e. use ¡°snap window¡± but allow other specs to cross-link in to >> ¡°scroll snap window¡± for better context.) >> >> Advantages: >> * shorter and easy to pronounce >> * relates to the concept of having a hole inside which we're >> viewing stuff, which is what it is >> * doesn't use the overloaded word ¡°viewport¡± >> >> Disadvantages: >> * ??? > > It's OK, but I prefer "snap-port" to imply the relationship to the viewport. I'm happy with "scroll snapport" as well. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 22:21:14 UTC