- From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:46:03 +0100
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Karl Dubost <kdubost@mozilla.com>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
Simon Pieters skrev: > On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:55:27 +0100, Florian Rivoal > <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > >> Last we spoke about this in New York, Microsoft wanted to either kill >> the zoom property (i.e. actually remove it from the implementations >> that support it), or to spec it and have it interoperably implemented >> across the board. The general preference was in favor of killing it, >> but Apple had some reservations and wanted to check more data before >> committing to killing it. >> >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0282.html >> >> I may have missed something, but I believe we did not revisit the >> topic later on, so we are still there: There's a general preference >> for getting rid of it, but no commitment, and we have a proposed spec >> that we could adopt if we decide to keep it after all. >> >> I believe the ball is in Apple's court. > > I see there's a use counter for 'zoom' (with a value other than 1) for > Chrome: > > https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/691 > > ~0.9% is pretty high... > > > Usage of 'zoom' (any value): > > https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/css/timeline/popularity/19 > > ~42%, crazy high. It's not clear to me if zoom:1 is a no-op or if it > does something. > Zoom 1 is a classic Trident hack to make it switch into a different layout mode. Should be a noop these days.
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 14:46:42 UTC