- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:47:19 +0100
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On 16/08/2016 07:57, Florian Rivoal wrote: > if others insists we drop it (back?) from must to should, I guess I can begrudgingly agree... i don't think i would. I thought i recently read that a decision was taken to keep keep assertions, but i can't remember where. Maybe PLH knows? the optional in the documentation dates, i think, from the beginning, and therefore substantially predates any recent discussions. I wouldn't take it prima facie as evidence that a decision was taken to make assertions optional. ri
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 16:47:29 UTC