- From: Xidorn Quan <me@upsuper.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:11:31 +1000
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>, John Daggett <jdaggett@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, at 05:27 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > I have only one (rather big) issue with the proposal: it's not very > friendly with experimental features/polyfills since there is no extra > storage room for user-defined font features... I don't think we should > ship any more anything at grammar-level that is not extensible because > all properties/features are hardcoded. I think objects returned from DOM / CSSOM are not frozen in general, so JS code should always be able to attach new attributes to those objects, shouldn't it? - Xidorn
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 08:14:10 UTC