W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-transitions] Normalization of steps()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:40:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBi=TqQWdrQh+w7QFxVFHy_ue4LXYMH61nA7xiksm=itw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
Cc: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 2016/04/08 1:37, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> The standard serialization strategy is to serialize with the minimum
>> amount necessary to accurately represent the value. If omitting some
>> component is the same as specifying a particular keyword, then all
>> values with that keyword serialize with it omitted, etc.
>
> Another follow up here, how does this principle apply to 'steps(1)' vs
> 'step-end'. Currently we have:
>
>  Chrome:  'steps(1)' -> 'step-end'
>  Firefox: 'steps(1)' -> 'steps(1)'
>  Edge:    'steps(1)' -> 'steps(1, end)'
>
> Also, it would be good to know if this is defined in CSSOM or somewhere
> else.

That's a lot more ambiguous!  Would be good to define that, actually.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 15 April 2016 17:41:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:38 UTC