W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-scoping] Cascading Order clarification for Shadow DOM

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:21:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCW74L_DJZgyKtQTg7Hd57mKpJDzWv4YMUeQ2Vz02a=7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
Cc: Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) <kochi@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote:
> (I and Tab chatted about this, but let me share my comment also here.)
>
> I no longer recommend to refer to the concept of "the tree of trees", which
> is now a *non-normative* concept.
> Recently, I have updated the Shadow DOM spec so that normative sections no
> longer depend on the concept of "the tree of trees".
>
> Instead, I guess you can use "shadow-including tree order" [1], if you want
> a well-defined order between nodes which share the same shadow-including
> root [2], across node trees.
>
> [1]: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-shadow-including-tree-order.
> [2]: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-shadow-including-root

Ah, good, that is indeed what I need.  I switched to that, and made
the surrounding definitions more rigorous.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 17:22:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:38 UTC