Re: [css-syntax] <urange> and it's problems

> 
> On Apr 13, 2016, at 05:37, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 1. Keep what I'm currently doing.  This requires browsers to hold onto
> the string representation of numeric tokens (numbers and dimensions)
> at least through initial parsing (longer if they're used in a custom
> property).

Does it really require that? Wouldn't it be good enough to hold onto the string representation of numeric tokens only when scinot is used? Given that scinot is pretty rare (and will stay that way), the memory requirement should be lower than storing the string representation of all numeric tokens.

 - Florian

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 00:31:38 UTC