- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:21:45 -0700
- To: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote: > On 11 Apr 2016, at 19:55, fantasai wrote: >> I think what you're expecting totally makes sense, but also >> fixing it would mean adding additional steps to the track >> sizing algorithm, which I'm a little hesitant to do right >> now... >> >> But something that's imho definitely worth investigating, >> so perhaps it would make sense to make this syntax invalid >> for the moment, so that we can figure out what to do with >> it in Level 2. > > > How are you thinking of invalidating? Forbid 'fr' units from being used in > the 'min' position, or ban then from minmax() expressions altogether, or > something else entirely? Forbid them from the min position. We already adjusted the grammar for this yesterday. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 19:22:32 UTC