- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:51:39 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On 24 Nov 2015, at 14:48, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > On 10/22/2015 04:05 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> This is an answer to issue 1 (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#issue-12d3b5df) >> >> There is a suggestion that we may need a third value besides proximity and mandatory, to say something like: stop on the next snap point in the scrolling direction even if the user flinged so hard that inertial would normally take us past it. >> >> I think this is a very useful distinction to make, but not as a third value. It should be a separate orthogonal property. >> >> [.... examples etc. ....] >> >> scroll-snap-stop: always | inertial > > Fwiw, following the TPAC discussions, Tab and I added this suggestion to our proposal as > scroll-snap-stop: normal | always > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap/#scroll-snap-stop Looks good, thanks. - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2015 05:52:08 UTC