- From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 14:07:59 +0000
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Rossen Atanassov <ratan@microsoft.com>, "Elika J. Etemad" <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
On 7/11/15 04:14, Florian Rivoal wrote: > TL;DR: as this is unstable stuff, if you're going to ship it, you > should (RFC 2119) ship with both inline-start and -moz-inline-start, > aliased to each other (and the same thing for *-end). If you're not > happy about aliasing the more important of the two is the > non-prefixed one. I don't think aliasing would be a big deal. What concerns me more is that none of this really helps authors be future-ready in the event that the WG ends up changing 'inline-start' to 'start'. Which was what Tab & fantasai seemed to have decided a couple of days ago; but AFAICT it doesn't look like there is any real WG consensus here. JK
Received on Saturday, 7 November 2015 14:08:29 UTC