- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:19:46 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 25/03/15 02:11, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> Yup, that's it. The change isn't intentional, it just falls out of the >> the easiest way to define it in each of the two grammar forms. >> >> I could rename <any-value> to <property-value> and make a new >> <any-value> that is less restrictive, if you think it's valuable. > > That sounds like as good a way to do it as any, but I do think we should fix > unintentional arbitrary syntax restrictions. Done. <any-value> and <declaration-value> are now defined in Syntax, and specs that previously used <any-value> have been updated as necessary. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 15 May 2015 23:20:37 UTC