- From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:49:47 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Bo J Campbell <bcampbell@us.ibm.com>
How much does user agents care about fully implementing a level before going for the next one? fantasai skrev: > While I think the CSS Speech module defines a really cool processing > model for speech rendering of a document, we don't have much in the > way of implementations. Also I suspect that a good speech stylesheet-- > one that enhanced, rather than interfered with, the speech user > experience--would be hard to create without a better understanding of > the "default UA stylesheet" and a fair amount of specialized training, > so would be beyond the capabilities of most authors. > > However, I think the 'speak' and 'speak-as' properties would be very > useful to have in the general authoring toolkit. The 'speak' property > in particular allows speech rendering to have different hiding/showing > of content than visual layout, without any weird hacks. So I'm thinking > maybe we should split CSS Speech into two levels: > > Level 1: 'speak' and 'speak-as' > Level 2: Everything currently in the spec. > > This might encourage implementation of 'speak' and 'speak-as' in > browsers. > > Thoughts? > > ~fantasai > > >
Received on Saturday, 27 June 2015 12:50:18 UTC