- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 08:41:54 +0000
- To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com> wrote: > > Hi list, > > Should 'scale: 2' be equivalent to 'transform: scale(2)' or 'transform: scale(2, 1)'? > > Clearly, 'scale: 2 2' should not expand to 'transform: scale3D(2, 2, 2)'. Is it better to be inconsistent between the one value and two value cases of the scale property, or to be inconsistent between the scale property and the scale transform function? Question is if `scale` even needs to scale in 3 dimensions. If it would just be 2 dimension my answer would definitely be a uniform scaling on both axis. Greetings, Dirk > > Cheers, > -Shane
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 08:42:25 UTC