Re: [selectors4] Features to Defer

On 22 July 2015 at 04:08, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 7/21/15 8:31 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>>
>> I'd feel better if any implementer could really share a
>> good reason about why this is complex though
>
>
> Just because it's a new codepath to add to parsing and selector matching,
> no?  It may not be particularly complex, but it's probably a few days of
> work at least and may not be a top priority for implementors...

If it's just "a few days of work", I wonder why the priority of
implementors lies somewhere else. From the discussions over many years
it should be clear that there is a strong desire from authors for this
feature.

Sebastian

Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 06:37:32 UTC