Re: [selectors] Need to clearly define matching for :first-child, :nth-*, etc from Daniel Glazman on 2015-07-15 (www-style@w3.org from July 2015)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:18:10 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <55A6B1F2.8030204@disruptive-innovations.com>

On 15/07/2015 21:02, Boris Zbarsky wrote:

> Yes. That consensus got reversed at some point

I can't recall such a decision and could not find one in six months
of confcall or ftf minutes. I could have missed it, of course.
And I'm not sure how we could reverse the behaviour of html:first-child
after 13 years of consistency...

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 19:18:36 UTC