- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 06:01:35 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/01/2015 01:51 AM, Koji Ishii wrote: > Let me try to summarize the issue and your proposal after clarifying > my understanding. > > The current spec defines[1]: >> If an atomic inline (such as an inline-block, inline-table, >> or replaced inline element) is not capable of providing >> its own baseline information, then the UA synthesizes >> a baseline table > > So my reading of the spec is that when an atomic inline *can* provide > its own baseline information, the central of the baseline is used in > vertical flow. Blink/WebKit follows this understanding. > > Your proposal is to change to always synthesize a baseline table, even > when an atomic inline can provide its own baseline information. Gecko > currently follow this interpretation. > > Gérard, is this an accurate summary? > > My preference is not to change, believing it is the original > intention, but I'll ask WG. Good summary. I believe the spec is as intended, and the question in my mind would be about use cases. But since you answered in [1] that both cases exist, I think the spec should not change, and the Blink/Webkit behavior is correct. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0324.html ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 10:04:57 UTC