- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:51:41 +0100
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
> On 21 Jan 2015, at 00:42, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> If it actually created an anonymous named flow out of all the paragraph
> content, I’d expect something more like:
>
> p {flow-into: foo content;}
> p {flow-from: foo;}
> #id {flow-from: foo;}
>
>
> Where all of the paragraph boxes become part of the region chain as well.
You are correct. I guess I am a bit tired.
> I’m still skeptical, because this seems like a lot of freight to add to a
> simple, useful property. I’d much rather keep the property focused on
> whether content stops at a fragmentation break or overflows as normal.
Sure. I don't really have an interest in pursuing this part about unnamed flows. I just thought of it while thinking through the rest, and though I'd just share it, more as evidence that 'fragmentation' is a sound primitive on top of which stuff can easily be built, rather than because I was convinced that this particular extension to it would beat regions.
- Florian
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 23:52:10 UTC