- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:50:21 -0800
- To: Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>
- Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>, David Bokan <bokan@google.com>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com> wrote: > Tab, > > Yeah, I think it makes sense to return all elements as if pointer-events is > auto. I'm not sure the flag is worth the complexity since it's pretty > trivial to implement pointer-events special handling if the user wants to. > For the SVG cases of pointer-events: visibleFill, etc, SVG has isPointInFill > and isPointInStroke. Ah, I wasn't aware of those methods in SVG. In that case I'm fine with this; I just thought it would be difficult to actually reimplement pointer-events filtering on your own. > A case where you would not filter out pointer-events: none is when you are > building a WYSIWYG editor that supports pointer-events: none elements. Makes sense. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 21:51:11 UTC