Re: [css-ruby] Conflict with HTML5 spec

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:40 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
wrote:

On 02/23/2015 05:22 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:10 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net
>> <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote
>>
> It looks fine, but shouldn't we also prefix
>> "ruby, rb, rt, rbc, rtc { unicode-bidi: isolate; }", and
>> "rtc:lang(zh-TW), rt:lang(zh-TW) { font-size: 25%; }"?
>>
>> Leaving "rtc:lang(zh), rt:lang(zh) { ruby-align: center; }" not to start
>> with "ruby >" is probably fine, though it could cause
>> confusing behavior in some cases.
>>
>
> Maybe? I'm not sure it's worth it, but I don't suppose it matters much.
>

BTW, it might also make sense to change "rtc > rt" to "ruby > rtc > rt".

But... hmm... it becomes too complicated...

I wonder whether we can raise an issue to change the HTML parsing algorithm
to remove those outstanding tags, just like what we do for internal table
elements. I need to investigate how that works in the spec.

- Xidorn