- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:06:36 +1100
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru>, Clive Chan <doobahead@gmail.com>, Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Feb 11, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> `el:has(+sibling)` > > Wouldn't that be `el:has(+next-sibling)`? The plus sign wouldn't determine if there were siblings that were non-adjacent to el, would it? That is why I'd want `el:has(~following-sibling)` too. It's an example with a fake element name; don't read too much into it. ^_^ But yeah, ~ is probably on the list too. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 05:07:23 UTC