- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:21:44 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/09/2015 05:15 PM, Dean Jackson wrote: > >> On 10 Dec 2015, at 08:19, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Per the Compat Spec <https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/>, there's a >> decent-sized list of CSS at-rules, values, and properties that >> need to be supported with a -webkit- prefix in order to be >> web-compatible: >> <https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/#css-compat-section>. >> >> Since implementors have to support these in order to >> realistically support web content, they should be listed >> alongside the features in the relevant specs (rather than >> sidelined into an easy-to-miss errata document like they >> currently are). > > I disagree. The existing implementors (obviously) know about these > properties. New implementors are unlikely to start from scratch. > And even if they do, the number of new implementors that appear > each year can be rounded to about zero. > As an implementor that started from scratch, I disagree. HTH Ms2ger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWaKltAAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2oM8H/0qd3crT2yzqyXPnSPr0t8hv JyDhtV54qewJDHPdxX4X3lvg1mvv1KeU99Zug+W+yuZn0kZrT+J7c2acEYYS7/i8 1IQCOHxHUxpyZ3SyVGySrclIpIDAD6zfw2/DG8eTI6qOICXVslQLXKTAiHz4h1bg So0r1pCXkyOAf0sOSMZb04Kgzt0eKnWTYt59tbSoH9bz3R9a2gzItxP+9o3rJ0yt cjCZmDcIIHyL4qjboxhtH8+QM071LSCBI7uo9kcxJ2qJtlWEVbsMay4AzEe9sIS3 K7943wzpPn4zdwxG3MCU/4Xcj9/hLar83EI8RwKRNCAPpF1pqvd1YQgAVvR/r8A= =Vt4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2015 22:22:14 UTC