- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:37:27 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > This thread doesn't seem to have stabilized, but when it does, yeah, I > think either Font Loading or Fonts is an acceptable place to put the > list. Ping me when you settle on a list and I'll get it in one of > those. So my proposal would be to include all the desired MIME types in the list per Vlad's email: * font/sfnt * font/ttf * font/otf * font/woff * font/woff2 And then extend that list with the MIME types that are either already registered or have seen somewhat significant usage per David's email: * application/font-woff * application/font-sfnt * application/font-sfnt * application/vnd.ms-fontobject (if EOT supported by everyone these days) * application/x-font-ttf * application/x-font-woff That seems like a good enough font MIME type whitelist going forward for usage with X-Content-Type-Options and in other contexts where they may be relevant. Note that application/octet-stream cannot be included as it is a generic MIME type. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 10:37:51 UTC