- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:54:52 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Thanks! On the same topic -- is there documentation anywhere (or a thread on this list) about why there's a required difference in behavior between downscaling & upscaling, for this "pixelated" value? >From reading the Blink intent-to-implement thread[1], it sounds like part of the reason may be that downscaling with nearest-neighbor doesn't actually *look* "pixelated" at all. This make some sense, but I'm not sure it makes sense to me that this reason (on its own) is enough to jusify requiring additional logic for "are we upscaling or downscaling" for every image-rendering-flavored operation that's influenced by this particular style. (and I wouldn't expect authors to be too mystified if "image-rendering:pixelated" produced gross, blocky behavior when downscaling.) Were there other reasons as well, or is that mostly it? Thanks, ~Daniel [1] In particular: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/Q8N6FoeoPXI/bq5U8544kE8J https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/Q8N6FoeoPXI/NPjrZxTLKAgJ ...and surrounding messages.
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 21:55:21 UTC