- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:38:20 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/17/2014 11:00 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been proposed before, but there seems no need for four values {over, under, left, right} when two
> would suffice: {before, after}, where 'before' means prior to (before) the first edge in the line progression direction and
> 'after' means subsequent to (after) the second edge in the line progression direction:
>
> *WM 'before' 'after'*
> lrtb over under
> rltb over under
> tbrl right left
> tblr left right
'over right' and 'under right' are both common combinations,
so {before, after} would not suffice.
~fantasai
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 20:38:48 UTC