Re: [css-align] Editorial: the 'stretch' definition moved, but the section titles weren't updated accordingly from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2014-09-05 (www-style@w3.org from September 2014)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:17:39 -0700
To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
Cc: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAdWCAb85QZeF+eCyN-CtO=UpwN6D_s6Ooj=ZoAxw+5qw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:08 AM, François REMY
<francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
> NOTE: This mail is targeting the current editor draft of CSS Box Alignment,
> not its current working draft, which is fine regarding this.
>
>
> In more details, my comments are:
> - Section 3.1's title still mentions ‘strecth’ (yet the section doesn't
> define it)
> - Section 3.3's title doesn’t mention ‘stretch’ (yet the section does define
> it)
>
> I believe the section titles should be updated to match their content (or
> vice-versa).

Fixed by updating the headings.

~TJ

Received on Friday, 5 September 2014 23:18:26 UTC