- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:16 +0100
- To: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>, "Henrik Andersson" <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:34:35 +0100, Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net> wrote: > Is there a clear specification that rules on which takes precedence, CSS > or explicit width and height attributes of an <img> element in a HTML > document? https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#attributes-for-embedded-content-and-images -> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#maps-to-the-dimension-property -> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#presentational-hints Your CSS rules using width and height properties win over <img width height> presentational hints. > The same goes for any replaced element: what if the replacing content > has a set size in the DOM? Or for that matter, if it has an intrinsic > size. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#inline-replaced-height -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 10:44:58 UTC