Re: [css-syntax] Dropping <number-token> representation, and its effects on <urange> from Florian Rivoal on 2014-11-20 (www-style@w3.org from November 2014)

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:39:29 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F0AD7AC6-FF7D-452C-A371-3E1FAA04C04B@rivoal.net>

> On 20 Nov 2014, at 00:24, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And it doesn't help us if we ever want to use <urange>
> in another property or context,
> which I think is plausible.

To support the statement about plausibility, my old draft proposal about @text-transform uses it:

https://wiki.csswg.org/ideas/at-text-transform#the-transformation-descriptor

 - Florian

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2014 13:39:54 UTC