W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: [css-ruby] spanning of ruby annotations across excess bases

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:55:55 -0500
Message-ID: <54667A6B.6060805@inkedblade.net>
To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>, kawabata taichi <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/14/2014 04:14 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:54 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net <mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>> wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, I don't see a problem here either. I would prefer, if it's
>> possible, that we only span if the content is directly contained
>> in an <rtc> rather than special-casing <rt>s that are the only
>> child. Is that workable? That was the original goal: to make
>> content directly contained by an <rtc> span all the bases.
>> The effects on <rt> was just error-handling that fell out of
>> that approach.
>
>
> I think it's workable. But I prefer the spec to say something like
> "If the only child of an <rtc> is an anonymous <rt>, which means
> that all content is directly contained by the <rtc>, it spans all
> the bases." so that we do not need to complexify the anonymous box
> generation part, and we won't apply something on <rt>s but forgot
> the content directly inside <rtc>s. Does that make sense?

Yes, that sounds exactly right. I will updated the spec accordingly.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 21:56:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:26 UTC