W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Flexbox children with display flex

From: Karen Menezes <karen.menezes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:13:03 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFQ+CRcz_2JDMs5UpKVd7Ry1pzbxaRJEX2jqascjar1yWcKnKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks Alan... I had come across this, but was unsure because they didn't
mention vertical inside vertical and horizontal inside horizontal :p



On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:

> On 11/10/14, 11:10 PM, "Karen Menezes" <karen.menezes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have a question regarding (immediate) children of a parent with
> >display: flex, i.e. a flex container. Can a child or flex-item also have
> >a display of flex associated with it, thereby becoming a flex-container
> >itself?
> >I was unable to find the answer here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/
> >What is the spec's take on this?
>
> The abstract mentions that nesting flex boxes is an expected use:
>
> "Nesting of these boxes (horizontal inside vertical, or vertical inside
> horizontal) can be used to build layouts in two dimensions.”
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 15:43:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:26 UTC