- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:37:56 +0100
- To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>, www-style@w3.org
MURAKAMI-san wrote:
> > One issue may be with the 'top-bottom' and 'bottom-top' keywords
> > (which were added in response to a use case described in [1]). If we
> > simply expand the keywords, we would get:
> >
> > top-bottom = block-start-block-end
> > bottom-top = block-end-block-start
> >
> > Which is longer, and perhaps not so intuitive.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0419.html
>
> I prefer block-start-end/block-end-start.
> When block/inline are obvious or duplicate they can be omitted.
Good, I've added these here:
http://figures.spec.whatwg.org/#floating-to-the-top-bottom:-float
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 18:38:31 UTC