- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 23:58:57 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/11/2014 02:34 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > 2. WD Lists > ------------- > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2014JanMar/0216.html I'm generally for this, although I think we need to publish some very clearly marked Issues on the sections (like list marker layout) which are complex, compat-relevant, and unreviewed. Haven't had a chance to look over which other sections should be thus marked, though. > 6. subgrid > ---------- > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2014JanMar/0218.html I posted some examples that I think are important and relevant to consider with regards to the accessibility impact of shipping Grid without subgrid. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0035.html ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2014 06:59:25 UTC