- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:23:32 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/28/2014 12:45 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 02/03/2014 06:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> I know it's currently at-risk, but I don't feel like that section of >> the spec will be CR-ready before Chrome and IE are ready to ship >> implementations of the rest of the spec publicly. We should go ahead >> and punt it now, rather than pretending that it'll stay through to CR >> or delaying the CR of the spec due to this. > > That would be equivalent to shipping Regions with only element-based > region containers. The reason many people in the WG are against that > is because it encourages bad markup design. Shipping grid without > subgrid also encourages bad markup design. Worse, in fact, because it > requires *stripping* markup that otherwise would be there, not just > adding in a few extraneous empty elements. Since this argument is very abstract, currently, I made some concrete examples: http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/discuss/subgrid-markup/ Enjoy! ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2014 08:24:00 UTC