W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Ignored Properties Inside a @keyframes block

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:12:54 -0700
To: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Sara Soueidan <sara.soueidan@gmail.com>, "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20140724181254.GA5998@crum.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2014-07-24 17:22 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  In
> > particular, some time ago we resolved that "non-animatable" properties
> > should still animate, by just flipping from the start value to the end
> > value at 50% of the transition's progress.  Nobody implements this
> > yet, but it's still intended behavior, afaik.
> 
> I was looking for this in css-transitions and I couldn't find it so we may
> have catch-up to do in both specs. I assume animations would do the same 
> thing for non-animatable properties, though of course the 50% point would 
> be the mid-point between the two keyframes that update the property. Does 
> that make sense?

We agreed to do this for animations and agreed NOT to do it for
transitions, so the prose should be in animations.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 18:13:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:23 UTC