W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [css-ruby] Nested Ruby

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <53CFA615.1040602@inkedblade.net>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style@w3.org
On 07/11/2014 10:25 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/11/14, 5:09 PM, fantasai wrote:
>> Yes, step 6 re-interprets the box as a ruby annotation. I'm not
>> sure how to make that more clear.
>
> Well, does step 4 create an anon box at all?  If not, I think
> _that_'s the part that needs to be clarified.

According to the text currently, yes. The box is constructed in
step 4, and is potentially transformed into a different type of
box in step 6.

If you have a better idea of how to explain the expected result,
let me know...

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 12:10:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:23 UTC