W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [css-animations] computation of values in keyframes (was Re: Possible spec bug?)

From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:40:52 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6EC4C1EB-CCC5-4D9E-8BCE-1EDA04ED42E5@adobe.com>

On Jul 17, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 2:08 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>>> Tab proposed in this thread back in 2011 that the 0% and 100%
>>> keyframes be "fully applied", although I'm not quite sure what it
>>> means and I don't think I like the sound of it.
>> 
>> Don't know what that means either. Hope we can discuss it on next week's telcon.
> 
> IIRC, it was me basically saying that we should apply the 0%/100%
> keyframes as if they were normal style rules, with all the
> interactions between properties that implies, rather than as
> individual properties like they do today.  It would avoid the problem
> noted here where, since 'border-style' is none in the static style,
> 'border-width' in the animation gets set to 0, even though
> 'border-style' is set to a non-none value in the same keyframe.
> 

OK, I agree with this principle though I'm not sure why that'd be limited 
to the 0% and 100% frames?
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 23:41:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:23 UTC