W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [css-animations] What happens if a @keyframes rule is added after the fact?

From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 01:49:02 +0000
To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
CC: "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FDF87769-BF46-44F0-B578-F344F2BB6C64@adobe.com>

On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 2014/07/08 7:43, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>> (b) seems simplest to me. What do you think Tab?
>> 
>> Yeah, on further thought, (b) is probably fine.  There's a
>> sufficiently justifiable asymmetry there between the "nothing, then
>> something" and "something, then something else" that I'm okay with it.
> 
> Ok, I've just now updated Firefox to do (b).
> 
> It would be nice to get the spec to reflect this but I understand there is a shortage of editorial resources for CSS Animations work. I'm happy to send PRs if there's a github mirror of the spec repository.
> 

We will discuss this on the call tomorrow but I took a first stab at covering this in this ED revision: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/2953a647c222
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 01:49:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:23 UTC