W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Re: [css-counter-styles] status of the spec

From: Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:58:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGdtn27YT99UcYxSgiLq_Ek99dNKVnWJsJTnSecc0CJVv3EbOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On 30 January 2014 13:54, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Re-ping ... I know lots of other good stuff is going on, but let's not
> forget this one, please!

See the "[CSSWG] Minutes Seattle F2F Mon 2014-01-27 PM II: CSS3
Backgrounds, CSS2.2, Counter Styles, -webkit-print-color-adjust" email
fantasai posted:

-----

  - RESOLVED: Drop definition of extended CJK counter styles
              (i.e. numbering beyond 10K) because ppl can't agree
              on when to drop ones and zeroes.
  - RESOLVED: Counter Styles to CR, once Tab finish off the DoC

-----

Thanks,
- Reece

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [css-counter-styles] status of the spec
> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:47:03 +0000
> From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>
> To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
>
> On 7/11/13 18:15, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm wondering about the current status of counter-styles, and whether
>>> there's a (tentative?) timeline for this spec going to CR. Or are we
>>> expecting to have a further LCWD, or ...?
>>
>>
>> I'm just clearing up the last comments now, and will request CR after
>> TPAC.
>>
>
> Hi Tab,
>
> Just a quick nudge: Now that the holiday period is over for most people,
> is there a chance we could move this forward soon?
>
> Thanks,
>
> JK
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 13:58:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 30 January 2014 13:58:30 UTC