W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [css-snappoints] Blink team position on snap points

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:06:57 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbsMOj3xKpSo2x+y3TS=barhLQoZ51WtHW_-xGT+ZTQXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cc: Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com>, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Nathaniel Duca <nduca@chromium.org>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:

> Instead of hard coding snap points into the platform, we'd rather the
> platform was powerful enough that framework authors can implement snap
> points themselves.
>
> As Rick stated, we're not opposed to this working group pursuing snap
> points.
>

These two positions seem inconsistent to me. If you don't want snapping
hard-coded into the platform, you should be opposed to the working group
pursuing that.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 21:07:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:19 UTC