- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:25:30 +1100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> According to the spec, it seems that all predefined styles except >>>> 'decimal' could be redefined by authors via @counter-style. My >>>> question is that, should the new defination affect other predefined >>>> styles depend on it? For example, if 'cjk-decimal' is redefined, >>>> should 'japanese-informal' fallback to the predefined 'cjk-decimal' or >>>> the new one? I prefer it to only depend on the name, which means the >>>> new one wins here. >>>> >>>> I think this behavior, including the redefinablity of predefined >>>> styles, should be clearly noted in section "'@counter-style' rule". >>> >>> Yes, it depends only on the name. This is already specified, in that >>> the 'fallback' descriptor only talks about names, and the normative >>> definitions of the various types all use the normal 'fallback' >>> descriptor. Nothing else needs to be said, normatively. >>> >>> I could add a note somewhere if you think it's unclear, though. If >>> you'd like this, where do you think it would be appropriate? >> >> I think the note should follow the paragraph with the term >> '<counter-style-name>' highlight. > > Do you mean this paragraph? > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#typedef-counter-style-name That's right. - Xidorn
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 22:26:39 UTC