W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:18:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBpUnO-e+qOxOKMNWeZ9Wx+ucQbPFznuHnFPCGDBAX8Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: www International <www-international@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> 6.2 Alphabetic: lower-alpha, lower-latin, upper-alpha, upper-latin,
> lower-greek, hiragana, hiragana-iroha, katakana, katakana-iroha
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#simple-alphabetic
>
> The hiragana, katakana, hiragana-iroha, and katakana-iroha seem to be
> implemented in the same way in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and now Opera. The
> implementation differs from the spec only by the addition of one or two
> characters to the basic set.
>
> Should we change the spec to align with the implementations?
>
> For more information see the test results at
> http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/css3-counter-styles/predefined-styles/results-cstyles#simplealpha

It's weird that the spec differs from implementations.  I don't
*think* I revised those algorithms at all.

I'd prefer to go ahead and match implementations unless they're totally off.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 23:19:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:19 UTC