W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-281: Problems with example 12

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:01:52 +0000
Message-ID: <52FE3DF0.20908@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
CC: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
The i18n WG believes that this issue has now been addressed and has 
closed the issue on our tracker system.

Thank you.

RI



On 30/10/2013 17:48, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote:
>> Hi Tab,
>>
>> Regarding:
>>
>>> Done, though I'm not sure what difference you think there is between
>>> simplified and traditional.  Other than the negative sign, both formals are
>>> identical, as are both informals.
>>
>> The difference is between the two formals:
>>
>> zh-Hant: 9678 4EDF 96F6 58F9
>> zh-Hans: 9646 4EDF 96F6 58F9
>>
>> Notice the simplified code point (U+9646) in the second one, as compared to the traditional code point (U+9678) in the first one.
>
> Whoops, sorry about that.  My eyes deceived me, and I didn't catch
> that the table of characters actually is different between simple and
> traditional formal styles in a few characters.
>
> Fixed now.
>
> ~TJ
>
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 16:02:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:19 UTC