W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [css-containment] ED of Containment ready for review (was overflow:clip)

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:49:31 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbjY514LFmQ1yE7Bkz2Af7yxtJrDtmJRoz=GW2f3bXyoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org>, Charles Walton <charleswalton@google.com>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>, Levi Weintraub <leviw@chromium.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:

> That's a good point. I suppose my leaning towards disallowing it comes
> from wanting the containment to be as strict as possible so that web
> authors can use contain:strict and not need to worry about the exceptions
> that break the containment. The downside to that is that it means SVG clip
> paths now need to know about contain:strictness, which is a bit of a bummer.
>

Not just clip-path but element() and fill:url() anything else that can use
url() syntax to refer to an element in the document.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 08:49:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:19 UTC